Case Studies
Results From Real Engagements
The following case study documents an engagement at Triumph Motorcycles, covering the challenge, the approach taken, and the measurable outcomes delivered.
Case Study
Triumph Motorcycles
Building a Resource Management Function From Scratch
Industry
Motorcycle Design and Manufacturing
Scale
500+ employees 30+ teams across 4 countries
Engagement Type
Resource management function built from scratch
Key Results
Measurable Impact Across Three Areas
Reduction in contractor usage — reactive hiring replaced by planned, data-backed capacity decisions
Resource-related team issues reduced — clarity eliminated conflict between teams competing for the same people
Annual R&D savings — approximately 5% improvement on a £60m R&D budget through stronger headcount control and reduced overspend
Of £900m annual revenue protected through on-time new model delivery, per assessment by Triumph's COO
The Challenge
Rapid Growth Without Visibility
Triumph's design and development function had grown rapidly. With over 500 people working across more than 30 teams in four countries, and new model projects running constantly across multiple disciplines, leadership had no standardised way to understand resource allocation or make confident decisions about capacity, hiring, or project commitments.
Resource decisions were being made reactively. Teams were competing for the same people without a shared picture of availability. Hiring was driven by urgency rather than data. Leadership needed a reliable view of the business, and the function to maintain it did not yet exist.
Specific challenges included:
No standardised means of tracking resource allocation across disciplines and new model projects
Reactive contractor hiring to cover gaps that could not be forecast in advance
Inter-team conflict driven by competing for shared resources without visibility of availability
Hiring decisions made on urgency rather than data-backed capacity analysis
Leadership unable to make confident forecasts for project timelines or headcount requirements
The Approach
Building the Function From Scratch
A resource management function was created where none previously existed, structured across three stages and designed from the outset to transfer capability to the organisation rather than create ongoing dependency.
Stage 1: Diagnosis and Understanding
Time was spent across engineering and development teams to understand how work actually flowed through the organisation — the handoffs, the bottlenecks, the informal workarounds, and the assumptions leadership held about capacity that did not match operational reality.
Stage 2: System Design and Implementation
A standardised, transparent system for tracking resource allocation was designed and implemented across all disciplines and new model projects. This included a capacity model reflecting how the business actually operated, a resource forecasting framework built on consistent planning rules, defined planning rhythms, and reporting structured to give leadership direction rather than status updates.
Stage 3: Embedding and Capability Transfer
Teams were trained on the system, documentation produced, and the function brought to operational maturity. The goal throughout was that the capability would belong to Triumph's own people when the engagement concluded.
Results in Detail
Three Areas of Measurable Impact
Contractor Usage
Contractor usage reduced by 85%. When capacity became visible, the reactive hiring spiral stopped. Planned hiring replaced reactive headcount decisions, and the organisation stopped relying on contractors to cover gaps it could not see coming. This represented a significant reduction in both cost and operational risk.
Team Stability
Resource-related team issues fell from 35% to 10%. When teams understood the plan and why decisions had been made, the conflict that comes from competing for the same people without shared visibility dropped significantly. Leadership reported a measurable improvement in team stability and a reduction in escalations.
R&D Budget Performance
Effective resource management contributed to approximately 5% improvement in R&D budget performance against a £60m annual R&D budget, driven by stronger headcount control and reduced overspend. In absolute terms, that represents roughly £3m in annual savings on R&D expenditure.
On-Time Model Delivery
The most significant financial impact came from delivering new model introductions to plan. Resource visibility was a material contributor to on-time delivery performance across new model projects.
“While improved budget control and greater financial predictability are important, they are materially less impactful than the profitability benefit of delivering all models to plan and on time.”
Jamie Looker, COO — Triumph Motorcycles
According to Triumph's COO, the profitability benefit of delivering all models on time could reasonably represent 5 to 10% of annual revenues against a £900m revenue base, depending on the model, volume, and margin profile.
Client Perspective
In Their Own Words
“Sean has helped to transform Triumph's ability to plan and manage resources to support new model projects. With the continued growth of Triumph's design and development teams, now more than 500 strong, I recruited Sean to a new independent Resource Manager role with the remit to create a standardised and transparent means of tracking resource allocation across multiple disciplines and new model projects.
I've been thoroughly impressed with Sean's ability to switch his approach depending on the audience. From a highly analytical facts and figures style working with Engineers, to a concise summary of business choices and impacts when presenting to Triumph's CEO. What once took us hours of discussion just to get everyone on the same page is now done in a much quicker and less painful way.
Despite overseeing a substantial change in working practices, Sean's personality has meant he's a very easy person to work with, retaining everyone's trust. With his approachable manner he's very much become the go-to person on resource management at Triumph.
Given the results achieved at Triumph I would thoroughly recommend Sean to anyone who's looking to improve their resource planning or on-going resource management processes.”
Geoff Hurst, Director — Triumph Motorcycles
A Note on Scale and Timeline
This engagement was structured as a full-time embedded role rather than a time-limited external project. Starting with three months of research and role definition, the engagement brought a 500-person, four-country organisation to resource management maturity over an extended period.
For a manufacturing or engineering business of 20 to 50 people, the same foundational outcomes — a clear process, reliable capacity visibility, and leadership able to make confident decisions — are achievable in weeks rather than years through Kivion's structured engagement methodology. The Triumph case study is evidence that the underlying approach works at significant scale and produces measurable financial results.
Request this Case Study
Want a formatted version of this case study to share internally?
Get in touch and we will send it directly.
Start Here
See What This Could Look Like for Your Business
The Triumph engagement was a full-time embedded role, but the underlying approach — diagnosis first, system design second, capability transfer third — is the same one Kivion applies in every consulting engagement. A free 45-minute consultation is the right starting point to understand whether resource management is a meaningful lever for your business.
No fee. No obligation.